The Anthropic Hypocrisy: "What's Yours Is Mine, What's Mine Is Mine"Why Practitioners Still Do Not Get Best Practices
Anthropic alleges that DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax ran "industrial-scale distillation campaigns" using 24,000 fraudulent Claude accounts and 16 million API exchanges to steal Claude's capabilities. They frame this as intellectual property theft and a national security threat.
The hypocrisy: Anthropic and other frontier AI labs built their foundation models by scraping, licensing, and appropriating massive amounts of data across all four quadrants of the EACOE data/information understanding framework - often without clear consent, compensation, or transparency. Now they demand legal protection for their own outputs while the original creators whose work fueled those models remain uncompensated and unacknowledged.
Categories
- Agility
- Architecture Models
- Architecture Views
- Artificial Intelligence
- Assemble to Order
- BTP
- Benefits
- Big Data
- Bill of Materials
- Book
- Business Architect
- Business Architecture
- Business Architecture Framework
- Business Architecture Participants
- Business Architecture Tools
- Business Capability
- Capabilities
- Capability Ability
- Certification
- Certification Levels
- Certification Mistakes
- Change Management
- Checklist
- Cloud
- Cloud Decommission
- Coding
- Communication
- Competition
- Complexity
- Confirmation Bias
- Consulting
- Cybersecurity
- Data
- Data Architecture
- Data Lake
- Data Modeling
- Data Sludge
- Data Swamp
- Differentiators
- Digital Transformation
- Distance Learning
- Enterprise Architect
- Enterprise Architecture
- Enterprise Architecture Framework
- Enterprise Architecture Participants
- Enterprise Architecture Tools
- Evaluation Checklist
- Evaluation Criteria
- Event Model
- Experiences needed
